Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975

From Gunsopedia
Revision as of 15:26, 15 March 2013 by Admin (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Yeah, that about sums it up.
The Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 was passed by the District of Columbia city council on September 24, 1976.[1] On June 26, 2008, in the historic case of District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court of the United States determined that the ban and trigger lock provision violate the Second Amendment. The law banned residents from owning handguns, automatic firearms, and "high-capacity" semi-automatic firearms, as well as prohibited possession of unregistered firearms. Exceptions to the ban were allowed for police officers and guns registered before 1976. The law also required firearms kept in the home to be "unloaded, disassembled, or bound by a trigger lock or similar device"[2], thus amounting to a prohibition on the use of firearms for self-defense in the home.[3]

Constitutionality

Washington, D.C.'s gun laws are considered by many to be the strictest in the United States, and have been challenged as infringing on constitutional rights protected by the United States Constitution's Second Amendment.[4][5] [6][7] On March 9, 2007, portions of the law were declared unconstitutional by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 ruling in the case District of Columbia v. Heller.[8] The District subsequently applied for a rehearing en banc, which was denied, and appealed the decision to the Supreme Court of the United States. On June 26, 2008, the Court determined that the ban and trigger lock provision violate the Second Amendment.[9] However, the ruling does not prohibit all forms of gun control; laws requiring firearm registration remain in place and have yet to be dealt with, as does the city's "assault weapon" ban.[10]

See also

References

  1. "Government Reform to Review D.C. s Handgun Ban" Congressman Thomas M. Davis
  2. "The Case For Reforming The District of Columbia's Gun Laws" National Rifle Association
  3. [http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200703/04-7041a.pdf "Case No. 04-7041, Parker v. D.C." United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. pp. 58. http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200703/04-7041a.pdf. Retrieved 2008-02-12. "Section 7-2507.02, like the bar on carrying a pistol within the home, amounts to a complete prohibition on the lawful use of handguns for self-defense."
  4. Kates, Jr. Don B. (1983). "Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment". Michigan Law Review 204.
  5. Reynolds, Glenn Harlan (1995). "A Critical Guide to the Second Amendment". Tennessee Law Review 461.
  6. Hirschman, Albert O. (1991). The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy.
  7. Polsby, Daniel P. (March 1994). "The False Promise of Gun Control". Atlantic Monthly.
  8. Miller, Bill and Robert Barnes (2007-03-09). "Appeals Court Guts D.C. Gun Ban" The Washington Post
  9. Sherman, Mark (2008-06-26). "Supreme Court Says Americans Have Right to Guns :P" The Washington Post
  10. Nakamura, David (2008-06-26). "D.C. Attorney General: All Guns Must Be Registered" The Washington Post
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox