Gunshot residue

Gunshot residue (GSR) is principally composed of burnt and unburnt particles from the explosive primer, the propellant, as well as components from the bullet, the cartridge case and the firearm used. There are authors who use other definitions, such as cartridge discharge residue (CDR) or firearm discharge residue (FDR).

Gunshot Residue (GSR) is the residue that gets deposited on the hands of the shooter after the bullet has been fired. It may or may not have some burnt, unburnt or semi-burnt particles.

At one point, the prevalent opinion among law enforcement was that GSR could be helpful in connecting the firearm to the culprit, establishing the identity of the shooter and in some cases may help in eliminating the probability when the number of suspects is more. This is no longer the case, however.

Theory

The theory was that gunshot residue can travel out from the gun to distances of 3–5 feet (0.9–1.5 meters) or even farther. At the farthest distance, only a few trace particles may be present. This information was thought to be useful in determining if someone was involved in the firing of the gun. Close to the gun barrel, the residue deposits more heavily on surfaces like skin and clothing, to the point of being visible as a dark stain. Detection of a significant amount of residue, therefore, was considered a powerful piece of forensic evidence that the particular person was very near to, even holding, the gun when it discharged.

History

In 1971 John Boehm presented some micrographs of GSR particles found during the examination of bullet entrance holes using a scanning electron microscope. If the scanning electron microscope is equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy detector, the chemical elements present in such particles, mainly lead, antimony and barium, can be identified.

In 1979 Wolten et al. proposed a classification of GSR following compositional criteria, morphology and size. Four compositions were considered "characteristic": lead, antimony and barium; barium, calcium and silicon; antimony and barium. The authors proposed some rules about the chemical elements which could also be present in these particles.

Wallace and McQuillan published a new classification of the GSR particles in 1984. They called "unique" particles the ones containing lead, antimony and barium, or the ones containing antimony and barium. Also for Wallace and McQuillan, in these particles only some chemical elements could be present.

Current status

The FBI ceased to consider gunshot residue as a valid source of evidence by May 2006 That decision came following a study which showed that for a high number of people who had been "proven to have fired a weapon" (contaminated with gunshot residue on clothing and body parts), gunshot residue had in fact been transferred by contact with police officers; at the taking of fingerprints, for example. In the U.S., this study has led to many forensic methods being re-examined. In the previous September, the agency decided to stop making comparative bullet lead analyses, a four-decades-old technique that purports to link a fired bullet with a particular box of bullets.

In the latest ASTM Guide particles containing lead, antimony and barium, and respecting some rules related to the morphology and to the presence of other elements are considered characteristic of GSR. The most definitive method to determine if a particle is characteristic of or consistent with GSR is by its elemental profile. An approach to the identification of particles characteristic of or consistent with GSR is to compare the elemental profile of the recovered particulate with that collected from case-specific known source items, such as the recovered weapon, cartridge cases or victim-related items whenever necessary. This approach was called ‘‘case by case’’ by Romolo and Margot in an article published in 2001. In 2010 Dalby et al. published the latest review on the subject and concluded that the adoption of a ‘‘case by case’’ approach to GSR analysis must be seen as preferable, in agreement with Romolo and Margot.

In light of similar particles which can be produced from extraneous sources, both Mosher et al. (1998) and Grima et al. (2012) presented evidence of pyrotechnic particles which can be mistakenly identified as GSR. Both publications highlight that certain markers of exclusion and reference to the general population of collected particulate can help the expert in designating GSR-similar particles as firework-sourced.

Particle analysis by scanning electron microscope equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy detector is currently believed to be the most powerful tool for forensic scientists to determine the proximity to a discharging firearm and/or the contact with a surface exposed to GSR (firearm, spent cartridge case, target hole), if proper attention is paid to avoid secondary gunshot residue transfer from officers onto subjects or items to be tested for GSR, and to avoid contamination in the laboratories.

Organic gunshot residue

Organic gunshot residue can be analysed by analytical techniques such as chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, and mass spectrometry.

References

• ASTM E1588-10e1, Standard Guide for GSR analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010.
• E. Boehm, Application of the SEM in forensic medicine, Scanning Electron Microscopy (1971) 553-560.
• O. Dalby, D. Butler, J.W. Birkett, Analysis of Gunshot Residue and Associated Materials—A Review, J. Forens. Sci. 55 (2010) 924-943.
• M. Grima, M. Butler, R. Hanson, A. Mohameden, Firework displays as sources of particles similar to gunshot residue, Science and Justice 52 (1) (2012) 49-57.
• H.H. Meng, B. Caddy, Gunshot residue analysis - review, J. Forens. Sci. 42 (1997) 553-570.
• P.V. Mosher, M.J. McVicar, E.D. Randall, E.H. Sild, Gunshot residue-similar particles produced by fireworks, Journal of the Canadian Society of Forens. Sci. 31 (3)(1998) 157–168.
• F.S. Romolo, P. Margot, Identification of gunshot residue: a critical review, Forensic Sci. Int. 119 (2001), 195-211.
• A.J. Schwoeble, D.L. Exline, Current Methods in Forensic Gunshot Residue Analysis, (2000) CRC Press LLC.
• J.S. Wallace, J. McQuillan, Discharge residues from cartridge-operated industrial tools, J. Forens. Sci. Soc. 24 (1984) 495-508.
• J.S. Wallace, Chemical Analysis of Firearms, Ammunition, and Gunshot Residue, (2008) CRC Press LLC.
• G.M. Wolten, R.S. Nesbitt, A.R. Calloway, G.L. Loper, P.F. Jones, Particle analysis for the detection of gunshot residue. I: Scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray characterisation of hand deposits from firing, J. Forens. Sci. 24 (1979) 409-422.
• G.M. Wolten, R.S. Nesbitt, A.R. Calloway, G.L. Loper, Particle analysis for the detection of gunshot residue. II: occupational and environmental particles, J. Forens. Sci. 24 (1979) 423-430.
• G.M. Wolten, R.S. Nesbitt, A.R. Calloway, Particle analysis for the detection of gunshot residue. III: the case record, J. Forens. Sci. 24 (1979) 864-869.

External links

• New Scientist, 23 November 2005, "Why we cannot rely on firearm forensics" (subscription required)