Joseph Manton
| Joseph Manton | |
|---|---|
| |
| Joe Manton (stood foreground) talking to Colonel Peter Hawker, 1st September 1827.
| |
| Born | June 6, 1766 Grantham, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom |
| Died | June 29, 1835(1835-06-29) (aged 69) London, England |
| Occupation | Inventor, gunsmith |
Manton had a keen interest in guns from an early age. The firearms of his day were sluggish, inaccurate and poorly designed. Although major advances in the general rate of fire were to come after his death, Manton is often credited with improving the quality of firearms in his time.
Contents |
Shotguns and rifles
Manton had been using the rifles and shotguns of his day for several years before he decided to improve on modern designs. It was in this field where he was first to make his fortune. Few guns of Manton's youth were rifled, and those that were tended to be expensive, slothful and brittle. At the age of 29, Manton was to create a mechanism that allowed him to rifle a barrel with greater ease. He also refined shot design to create a wooden cup that allowed for faster reloading and greater accuracy; it is from this design that modern munitions are based.
Manton observed that people new to sport shooting tended to aim too low when firing at targets (i.e., failing to account for bullet drop). Manton made the simple adjustment of making the front sight lower so that anyone aiming the gun would actually be shooting above where they thought they were, thus correcting this common novice error.
Shooters trusted Manton's guns above all others, this is evidenced by the fact that few, if any of his guns were legally tested by the Worshipful Company of Gunmakers. His octagonal barrels were simply inscribed with Jos'h' Manton and the tiger emblem.
Dueling Pistols
Manton's next great step in the world of gunsmithing came from observing duels. He noticed that the recoil or "kick" from the dueling pistol forced back the forearm of the shooter, causing the elbow to bend upwards. Once again, a simple design alteration vastly improved the quality of the guns. Manton increased the weight at the front end of the barrel which steadied the gun. Again, this proved popular with the customers.
Artillery
The greater part of Manton's career was to be spent at loggerheads with that bastion of adaptability, the British Army. Manton managed to interest the army in purchasing a larger a version of his wooden cup design to be used in rifled artillery. Manton worked tirelessly to improve the very inaccurate cannon, and did so by creating a new type of ammunition, which was to be loaded in a rifled cannon. The cannonball was attached to the wooden cup that fit into the rifled grooves of the cannon, which was in turn connected to a sack of gunpowder, thus eliminating the need for powder and shot to be loaded separately. The idea of having the powder fixed behind the shot in a disposable container is one still extant today; it is the basis for modern bullet design. It also helped pave the way for breech-loading weaponry.
Lost sale
The army provided him a cannon and funding, and in return expected a greatly improved weapon. Whilst there is little doubt Manton's design was superior, an argument over payment was to cause the army to declare it of small benefit. The row erupted over how Manton was to be paid; he believed the agreement was to a £30,000 lump sum. The army argued that since they had already invested sunk costs into research and development, they did not want to give away such a huge amount of money to a man whose design had not been tested in the field. Manton, angered, patented his design, twisting the army's arm into making him a deal. The army offered him one farthing for each shell they produced, but Manton refused this offer. Surprisingly for Manton, the army stood their ground and didn't make him a new offer. Manton, frightened at the prospect of having spent a great deal of time and money (including much of his own) in developing a weapon that the army would not use, returned a new offer to the army, whereby they could make the shells without paying royalties, but Manton would make the wooden cups. They refused.
Having spent more than a decade in unsuccessful legal battles against the Board of Ordnance, Joseph lost his vast fortunes and was declared bankrupt in 1826. His entire Oxford Street workshop was seized and his stock of guns sold by Joseph Lang, an aspiring gunsmith who would form Atkin, Grant and Lang[1]. Lang is credited with opening one of the first shooting schools in the premises adjoining Manton's property.
Tube Lock
In the early 19th century Manton invented the tube (or pill) lock, an improvement over Alexander Forsyth's scent-bottle lock.[2] Rather than storing a reserve of fulminate in a container they were now single-use pellets.
The hammer of the gun was sharpened; when it fell it crushed the tube, causing the fulminates to detonate. This was more reliable than Forsyth's design and was adopted by the Austrian army and many sportsmen during the Regency period. However it was overshadowed by the invention of the percussion cap which was adopted by the armies of Britain, France, Russia and America to replace the flintlock.[3]
Legacy
As he was in his own time, Manton is revered as a maker of fine weaponry today. His works are considered the finest of the flintlock age, and often fetch considerably more at auction than even Holland & Holland's historical or modern shotguns.
Another example of Manton's huge influence on the art of gunmaking is the fact that his workforce included: James Purdey (who went on to found the world famous Purdey's), Thomas Boss, Joseph Lang, William Greener and Charles Lancaster. These five all went on to establish firms which ranked amongst the greatest gunmakers of the nineteenth century, all of these firms continue to make guns of supreme artistry.[4]
References
- ↑ Kings Of The Trigger - Biographical Sketches Of Four Famous Sportsmen: The Rev. W.B. Daniel, Colonel Peter Hawker, Joe Manton and Captain Horatio Ross, by Thormanby, Published 1901, London
- ↑ Kinard, J, Pistols an illustrated history (2004) p.52-54
- ↑ Ricketts, H, Firearms (London, 1962)
- ↑ British Association of Shooting and Conservation magazine, Jan/Feb 09
