| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| | | | |
| | ==Legal action== | | ==Legal action== |
| − | Identified as the "legal arm of the gun rights lobby"<ref>[http://civilliberty.about.com/od/guncontrol/a/Second-Amendment-Foundation.htm "Profile: Second Amendment Foundation"]. About.com</ref> the Second Amendment Foundation has been victorious, and is currently engaged in numerous lawsuits in various states of the U.S., all defending Second Amendment rights.<ref>[http://www.saf.org/?page_id=28 "2nd Amendment Legal Action"]. SAF website.</ref>
| + | In 2006, a Suit was filed in federal court against the North Central Regional Library District (NCRL). “The NCRL’s policy of refusing to disable its Internet filters upon request is restricting the ability of speakers, content providers and patrons of the NCRL’s public-library branches to access the contemporary marketplace of ideas” by using Internet filters on publicly available computer terminals to block access to constitutionally protected speech, including publications such as Women & Guns magazine, which is owned by SAF. It is claimed the library refuses to unblock such access even at the request of the plaintiffs. <ref>[http://www.saf.org/viewpr-new.asp?id=203]</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | In [[2005]], the Second Amendment Foundation and the [[National Rifle Association]] successfully sued New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin and others to stop gun seizures in the wake of [[Hurricane Katrina]]. On [[February 12]], [[2007]], Ray Nagin and others were held in contempt of court for violating the consent order.<ref>Carl J. Barbier, U.S. District Judge ([[February 12]], [[2007]]). [http://saf.org/new.orleans.lawsuit/order.for.contempt.pdf "Order And Reasons"]</ref> The case is "National Rifle Association of America, Inc., et al. v. C. Ray Nagin et al.".<ref>CNN [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0807/02/gb.01.html transcript of NRA video interviews, aired on July 2, 2008] by Glenn Beck</ref> | + | In 2005, the Second Amendment Foundation was among several groups including the [[National Rifle Association]] who successfully sued New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin and others in order to stop gun seizures in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. The organizations have (as of March 2006) also filed documents seeking to hold Nagin and others in contempt of court for violating the consent order. The case is “National Rifle Association of America, Inc., et al. v. C. Ray Nagin et al.”.<ref>[http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0807/02/gb.01.html] CNN transcript of NRA video interviews, aired on July 2, 2008 by Glenn Beck</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | In 2005, SAF and others sued to stop the [[Proposition H|San Francisco gun ban]]. On [[June 13]], [[2006]], San Francisco Superior Court Judge James Warren struck down the ban, saying local governments have no such authority under California law. The City appealed Judge Warren's ruling, but lost in a unanimous opinion from the three judge panel in the Court of Appeal issued on [[January 9]], [[2008]]. The City then appealed to the California Supreme Court, which reached a unanimous decision on [[April 9]], 2008, that rejected the city's appeal and upheld the lower courts' decision. | + | In 2005, SAF and others sued to stop the San Francisco gun ban. As of March 2006, the court had not issued a ruling. The case is “Paula Fiscal et al. v. City and County of San Francisco et al.” |
| | | | |
| − | In 2008, the Second Amendment Foundation and the [[National Rifle Association]] successfully sued the state of Washington, forcing the state to restart issuing and renewing Alien Firearms Licenses to legal resident aliens.<ref>NRA and SAF. [http://saf.org/legal.action/wa.alien.resident.lawsuit/wa.alien.resident.complaint.pdf "Preliminary Injunction"]</ref>
| + | On June 27th 2008, following the ruling affirming an individual second amendment right to keep and bear arms by The U.S. Supreme Court, The Second Amendment Foundation filed suit against The City of Chicago to overturn it's handgun ban. |
| | | | |
| − | On [[June 26]], [[2008]], following the ruling in ''[[District of Columbia vs. Heller]]'' affirming an individual Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms by the Supreme Court of the United States, the Second Amendment Foundation filed a suit, known as ''[[McDonald v. Chicago]]'', against the City of Chicago to overturn its [[handgun ban]].<ref>SAF ([[June 26]], [[2008]]). [http://www.chicagoguncase.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/complaint.pdf "Complaint"]</ref> [[Alan Gura]], who successfully argued ''Heller'' before the Supreme Court, was lead counsel in this case. On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court held in ''McDonald'' that the [[Second Amendment to the United States Constitution]] is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and applies to the states.<ref>SCOTUS (June 28, 2010). [http://www.chicagoguncase.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/mcdonaldopinion08-1521.pdf "McDonald Opinion"]</ref> In a noteworthy concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas held that the application of the Second Amendment to the states was through the Fourteenth Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause.
| + | Following the [[District of Columbia vs. Heller]] decision in 2008, the Second Amendment Foundation partnered with [[Smith & Wesson]] to create a commemorative revolver. On the right side plate of the revolver, the scale of justice is depicted with the case name across the scale. The balance is in favor of the "Heller" name with the court date of "June 26, 2008" positioned across the top. Underneath the scale, the side plate reads "Second Amendment" and "The right to keep and bear arms" in white lettering. The revolver was presented to the six plaintiffs of the case and will be available for customer purchase in Fall 2008.<ref>[http://www.smith-wesson.com/wcsstore/SmWesson/upload/othe/PR-Second%20Amendment%20Foundation%20and%20Smith.pdf Second Amendment Foundation and Smith & Wesson Partner on Commemorative Revolver: Engraved Model 442 Will Recognize District of Columbia vs. Heller Decision] [[Smith & Wesson]] July 21, 2008</ref> |
| − | | + | |
| − | Following the ''Heller'' decision in 2008 in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects an individual's [[right]] to possess a [[firearm]] for private use, the Second Amendment Foundation partnered with [[Smith & Wesson]] to create a commemorative revolver. On the right side plate of the revolver, the scale of justice is depicted with the case name across the scale. The balance is in favor of the "Heller" name with the court date of "June 26, 2008" positioned across the top. Underneath the scale, the side plate reads "Second Amendment" and "The right to keep and bear arms" in white lettering. The revolver was presented to the six plaintiffs of the case and will be available for customer purchase in Fall 2008.<ref>[[Smith & Wesson]] ([[July 21]], [[2008]]). [http://www.smith-wesson.com/wcsstore/SmWesson/upload/othe/PR-Second%20Amendment%20Foundation%20and%20Smith.pdf "Second Amendment Foundation and Smith & Wesson Partner on Commemorative Revolver: Engraved Model 442 Will Recognize District of Columbia vs. Heller Decision"]</ref>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | On [[June 29]], [[2010]], following the ''McDonald'' ruling by the Supreme Court that the Second Amendment is incorporated against the states, the Second Amendment Foundation, along with [[Grass Roots North Carolina]] and three North Carolina citizens, filed a federal suit<ref>Alan Gura (June 28, 2010). [http://www.scribd.com/doc/33708035/Bateman-v-Perdue-1-Main "Complaint, Bateman vs. Perdue"]</ref> in North Carolina. The suit, known as ''[[Bateman vs. Perdue]]'', seeks to prevent local officials and local governments from declaring states of emergency under which private citizens are prohibited from exercising their right to bear arms.<ref>SAF (June 29, 2010). [http://saf.org/viewpr-new.asp?id=329 "SAF Sues to Overturn North Carolina's `Emergency Powers` Gun Bans"]</ref> [[Alan Gura]], who successfully argued ''Heller'' and ''McDonald'' before the Supreme Court, is lead counsel in this case.
| + | |
| | | | |
| | ==Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms== | | ==Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms== |
| Line 30: |
Line 26: |
| | | | |
| | ==References== | | ==References== |
| − | {{reflist}}
| + | <references/> |
| | | | |
| | == External links == | | == External links == |
